Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 0.55, Δ 0.09).
- Cagliari was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Como held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 283 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 493Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.51 | Goals prevented | 0.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.