Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 2.54, Δ 1.11).
- Pisa fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Cagliari was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.54Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 315Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 401Lead | Total passes | 264 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.11 | Goals prevented | -0.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.