Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 0.62, Δ 0.59).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 466 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.