Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 1.25, Δ 0.46).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 64%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 244Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 382Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.