Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (4.35 vs 0.17, Δ 4.18).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Cambridge United was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.17 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 219Lead | Accurate passes | 152 |
| 346Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.