Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 18%).
- Reading held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.