Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 64%Lead |
| 177 | Accurate passes | 185Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 290Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.