Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (2.09 vs 0.10, Δ 1.99).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Cambridge United held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 2.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.10 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 297Lead | Accurate passes | 206 |
| 413Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Swindon Town |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |