Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 0.85, Δ 0.84).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Tranmere was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 301Lead | Accurate passes | 152 |
| 410Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.