Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 1.42, Δ 0.49).
- Walsall fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Cambridge United was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 300Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 426Lead | Total passes | 318 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambridge United | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.