Match statistics snapshot
- Cambuur fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Jong AZ was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 29%).
- Cambuur held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.