Match statistics snapshot
- Cambuur fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- VVV Venlo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 40%).
- Cambuur held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Vvv Venlo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Vvv Venlo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 418Lead | Total passes | 275 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Vvv Venlo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Vvv Venlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cambuur | Statistic | Vvv Venlo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |