Match statistics snapshot
- Cape Town City fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Cape Town City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Moroka Swallows |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 8 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Moroka Swallows |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Moroka Swallows |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Moroka Swallows |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Moroka Swallows |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |