Match statistics snapshot
- Richards Bay fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Cape Town City was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 317Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 398Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cape Town City | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.