Match statistics snapshot
- Carabobo FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.57, Δ 0.07).
- Carabobo FC was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Huachipato |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.57 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Huachipato |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 395Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Huachipato |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Huachipato |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.38 | Goals prevented | -0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Huachipato |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |