Match statistics snapshot
- Sporting Cristal created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.08, Δ 0.11).
- Carabobo FC fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Carabobo FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 298Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 361Lead | Total passes | 272 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.86 | Goals prevented | 0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carabobo Fc | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.