Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico-MG created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 2.01, Δ 0.82).
- Atletico-MG fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Caracas FC was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Caracas Fc | Statistic | Atletico-mg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Caracas Fc | Statistic | Atletico-mg |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 728Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 791Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Caracas Fc | Statistic | Atletico-mg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Caracas Fc | Statistic | Atletico-mg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Caracas Fc | Statistic | Atletico-mg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.