Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Cardiff was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
- Cardiff held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 577Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 655Lead | Total passes | 346 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |