Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.65, Δ 0.77).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
- Cardiff held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |