Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 1.22, Δ 0.54).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Cardiff was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 398 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |