Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 1.53, Δ 0.99).
- Cardiff fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 340 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
| 418 | Total passes | 558Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |