Match statistics snapshot
- Cardiff created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 0.59, Δ 0.66).
- Cardiff fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Cardiff was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 154 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 252 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cardiff | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |