Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 30%).
- Carlisle held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.