Match statistics snapshot
- Carlisle fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Nottingham Forest U21 was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 16%).
- Carlisle held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Nottingham Forest U21 |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Nottingham Forest U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Nottingham Forest U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Nottingham Forest U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Nottingham Forest U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.