Match statistics snapshot
- Carlisle fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 273Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 373Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |