Match statistics snapshot
- Carlisle fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.