Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Carlisle was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 67%Lead |
| 254Lead | Accurate passes | 238 |
| 393Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.