Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Carlisle was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 269Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 395Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carlisle | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |