Match statistics snapshot
- Carrarese created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.45, Δ 0.69).
- Carrarese fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- Cesena was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.77 | Goals prevented | 0.77 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |