Match statistics snapshot
- Mantova created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 1.17, Δ 0.31).
- Mantova fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Mantova was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 377Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.78 | Goals prevented | -0.78 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Carrarese | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.