Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (0.56 vs 0.49, Δ 0.07).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 0.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 337 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.