Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 1.62, Δ 0.26).
- Estoril fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.59 | Goals prevented | 0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |