Match statistics snapshot
- Estoril created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 1.28, Δ 0.17).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 300Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 387Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.