Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 0.52, Δ 0.04).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.