Match statistics snapshot
- Farense created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 1.14, Δ 0.25).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (24 vs 7 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 446Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 520Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |