Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.01, Δ 0.14).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 405Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 278 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.09 | Goals prevented | -0.09 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |