Match statistics snapshot
- Portimonense created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 0.80, Δ 0.01).
- Portimonense fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 455Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.