Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 0.46, Δ 0.01).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6 |
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 280 | Accurate passes | 322Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 406Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.