Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 0.61, Δ 1.73).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |