Match statistics snapshot
- Tondela created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 1.18, Δ 0.73).
- Tondela fired more attempts (9 vs 4 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 56%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 329Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 404Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Casa Pia | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 8 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |