Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Catanzaro held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 3 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.