Match statistics snapshot
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 10%).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 425Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |