Match statistics snapshot
- Catanzaro created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.67, Δ 0.17).
- Catanzaro fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Monza was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 461Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.12 | Goals prevented | 0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |