Match statistics snapshot
- Catanzaro created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 0.45, Δ 1.08).
- Catanzaro fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 351Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.