Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 36%).
- Pisa held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 286 | Accurate passes | 550Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 611Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.