Match statistics snapshot
- Spezia created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 2.04, Δ 0.25).
- Catanzaro fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Spezia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.04Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Spezia |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 413Lead | Total passes | 229 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Spezia |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Spezia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Catanzaro | Statistic | Spezia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |