Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 20%).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalier | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalier | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 489Lead |
| 300 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalier | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalier | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalier | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.