Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 23%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Atlético Ottawa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Atlético Ottawa |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 540Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Atlético Ottawa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Atlético Ottawa |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Atlético Ottawa |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |