Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 17%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 189 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 257 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |