Match statistics snapshot
- Forge fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 449Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cavalry Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |